However, Samsung can't meet current demand from all phone makers and couldn't supply enough for Apple. Seems that even if Apple got 100% of Samsung's capacity, it would only have been 50% of what Apple needed. They then went long term with LG for their screens, which was developed by LG and Hitachi.
I am not sure where you get your results.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/24/iphone-4-retina-display-vs-galaxy-s-super-amoled-fight/2
"Once again, it's a pretty impossible task to differentiate between the output of the Retina Display and Super AMOLED, though if we have to choose, Samsung will get the nod. "
Now, BOTH of them, in fact any display is not ideal in full sunlight, but you can see the pictures yourself, both are entirely readable and reasonable.
Bottom line, I believe, we are nibbling at the fringes with differences. Kind of like my car will do .93 on the skidpad while yours does a measly .91. Oh yeah, well my car does 0-60 in 5.3, not the horse and carriage 5.6 yours does.
Which, above 300DPI, Apple already is over what the human eye can see. "only 268 DPI". Ugh, how can you stand such "crap", lol.
TripleII
No comments:
Post a Comment